Results remain on screen. Copying or downloading the report asks for an email once per browser. Four checks per network per day.
An annual Nakada Design study that measures the public websites of 92 leading galleries, interior designers, architects, photographers, luxury houses, brokerages and yacht firms, and scores each out of 100 for AI visibility, performance, search readiness and craft. The full ranking and methodology are published on our site.
Yes. The scoring is a line-for-line port of the study's measurement engine: the same probes, the same thresholds, the same pillar weights. The one difference is vantage. Response time is measured from Cloudflare's network rather than a residential line, so the performance pillar can read a few points kinder here than in the published table.
Some houses run firewalls that refuse any visitor they cannot fingerprint as a browser. The study lists them as sealed rather than ranked; thirteen of the 105 sites measured in 2026 fell in that category, Hermès and Chanel among them. A site that turns away neutral clients is also unreadable to AI assistants, which is worth knowing in itself.
Whether ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and their crawlers can reach and read your site: robots.txt permissions for six named AI crawlers, enough readable text in the served HTML to describe you correctly, structured data that states who and where you are, and an llms.txt file. A growing share of client research now happens inside these assistants.
Yes, within daily limits: four checks per network per day. Results stay on screen; copying or downloading the report asks for an email once per browser.